Database Security (Common-sense Principles)
Places that viruses and trojans hide on start up
Step-by-Step Guide to Using the Security Configuration Tool Set
Improving the Security of Your Site by Breaking Into it
Domain Name Robbery
XDCC - An .EDU Admin's Nightmare
Database Security
Database Security
Is Database Security an Oxymoron?
Database security: protecting sensitive and critical information
The database security blanket
Database security in your Web-enabled apps
Making Your Network Safe for Databases
SQL Injection: Modes of Attack, Defence, and Why It Matters
Database Security in High Risk Environments
Linksys Router Information (A collection)
Common Ports
Protection of the Administrator Account in the Offline SAM
Windows 2000 Security
The dangers of ftp conversions on misconfigured systems
Win98.BlackBat
AnnaKournikova worm decrypted
C/C++ made easy with GoGooSE 1.0
UNIX Bourne Shell Programming
BATCH ProgramminG
Assembly for nerds using linux
THE LATEST IN DENIAL OF SERVICE ATTACKS: "SMURFING"
The Ingredients to ARP Poison
Outlook 2002: can't send .exe file with Email
Windows 9x/Me Security and System Restrictions
Exploiting The IPC Share
Local Windows hacking
Windows Cryptic Error Messages
Windows NT Registry Tutorial
catch a macro virus
Protecting Files with Windows NTXP
Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer V1.1
A Beginners Guide To Wireless Security
Default Logins and Passwords for Networked Devices
How To Eliminate The Ten Most Critical Internet Security Threats
About computer crime
System Backdoor Information
System Backdoors Explained
Introduction to Buffer Overflow
Donald Pipkin's Security Tips for the Week of December 23rd
Getting IP data from numerous sources
Rainbow Series Library [The One The Only]
Honeypots (Definitions and Value of Honeypots)
General Attack Descriptions
Wireless Taping
CYBERTERRORISM
Security from a different angle
 

 

Crypto A Crime? -03 Mar 2003
Crypto A Crime?

I asked this question of my network security brethren, post Sept. 11th and how much more crappy legislature do we have to deal with? First came along the Patriot Act which generalized a description of a terrorist so that practically anyone could fit the bill.

And now comes along a new piece of legislature that is going to be introduced to the senate. In this piece of Legislature it will supposedly make the use of cryptographic material during a crime an additional felony. This means that if you break any law and in the process at anytime use a form of encryption you will gain an additional felony offense.

Once again this legislature has broad definitions of the word encryption. They have in essence included any form of Encryption, Including encryption that may be used during authentication methods with programs. So if you're using PKI or SSL or another form of encryption and you perform a crime, no matter how minor, you could possibly be facing felony charges in addition to the crime you were originally charged with.

Now many people would say that if you are on the straight and narrow, then there’s nothing you should worry about. But, that’s not the point here. The point is, that the government continues to use a generalized approach to drafting legislature. Instead of attempting to invent new ways for attaching additional penalties to crimes, they should just stiffen penalties for already existing crimes.

An article in Security Focus, properly illustrated this point.
View original article at: http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/145
Mark Rash gives us an example of how far this legislature can go.

If you're purchasing a book from Amazon.com, and perhaps decide not to click on the “include sales tax” button. And you were then caught. You can then be charged with a felony criminal offense. The reason being that during the transaction you used SSL. This is a 128 bit encryption algorithm. Hence, you used encryption during the commission of your crime. Obviously this illustration makes it painfully apparent how ridiculous this piece of legislation is.

Now I'm not saying encryption will not be used during terrorist activities or criminal activities. My point is that this legislation does nothing to prevent that, and nor does it strike any additional fear in the heart of the criminal. So such useless legislature will hopefully never get past.

Blake Wiedman
Founder Governmentsecurity.org

[Back to list]