.
Sponsored by: █ Sparkhost - Hosting Without Compromises! █ Hybrid Performance Web Hosting █ Spark Host Stream Hosting █ Hybrid IRC & IRCd Server Shell Accounts
Vote For Which Project You Want!
Started by
Travis
, Oct 26 2003 09:44 PM
29 replies to this topic
#1
Travis
-
- Sergeant Major
-
- 2,101 posts
Specialist
Posted 26 October 2003 - 09:44 PM
Well at jut over 9.5% i don't quite see it winning but do what you feel you want to do .
.
#2 Guest_scooby_*
Guest_scooby_*
-
- Guests
Posted 27 October 2003 - 07:58 AM
i am confused between two of these
1. Security Scanner
2. Vulnerabilities Source Code Analyser
umm... can be either of these
1. Security Scanner
2. Vulnerabilities Source Code Analyser
umm... can be either of these
#3
shaun2k2
-
- Sergeant Major
-
- 348 posts
Staff Sergeant
Posted 21 October 2003 - 10:42 AM
What would you like the team to create? Let's have your input here. Poll will end next friday.
Thank you for your time.
Shaun.
Thank you for your time.
Shaun.
#4
ducky
-
- Members
-
- 149 posts
Specialist
Posted 21 October 2003 - 11:19 AM
i choose other...maybe it's immpossible but would be nice for a GUI compiler for c and/or others...
many of ppl here getting problems compiling stuff
many of ppl here getting problems compiling stuff
#5
Kenny
-
- Retired Admin
-
- 6,747 posts
Former Commander In Chief
Posted 21 October 2003 - 11:46 AM
well this is my sort of interest..so i voted
Vulnerabilities Source Code Analyser
Vulnerabilities Source Code Analyser
#6 Guest_OneNight_*
Guest_OneNight_*
-
- Guests
Posted 21 October 2003 - 12:25 PM
I voted for Vulnerabilities Source Code Analyser too.
Would be useful for me at any rate... more than the others.
Would be useful for me at any rate... more than the others.
#7 Guest_coder_*
Guest_coder_*
-
- Guests
Posted 21 October 2003 - 12:50 PM
lol, re-inventing the wheel... 
#8
GAN_GR33N
-
- Members
-
- 163 posts
Corporal
Posted 21 October 2003 - 01:11 PM
i reall y like the idea of the Source Code Analyser but i think its a little over my coding skills and i would not know where to start but i'll help any way i can
#9 Guest_tte_*
Guest_tte_*
-
- Guests
Posted 21 October 2003 - 03:19 PM
I would have voted Vulnerabilities Source Code (without Analayzer 
), Didnt you say shaun you'd try and see whats the demand for xploits ?
I'm pretty confident this is the only thing myself (and many others) will have use of, but not only for whooping boxes, yet also helping others understand how exploits work and how to write them. I'm sure not few coders could use such examples, and ask questions directly.
But eventually, since you are complaining that most of the masses will use it for defacing boxes, I can just say that most of whats talked about in governmentsecurity forums is defacement of sites, tools for defacement, autorooters, new exploits and so on. not to mention - giving a public stage for defacing experiences, and compiled working exploit codes. So you're not quite "off the responsibility" on this one. You do help the kids deface, whether you like it or not. I, however, personally don't have any objection to this act, since those companies who make the programs, Micro$oft at particular, will never do enough to improve their products' security otherwise. they just won't learn, and customers who get hit might try alternatives, which will also affect those companies who release buggy products, to improve. and fact is, as much as i believe in the microsoft-u.s. government infamous conspiracy, they have got security standards much higher then how it was few years ago (yet still not good enough).
just my 2cents...
), Didnt you say shaun you'd try and see whats the demand for xploits ?I'm pretty confident this is the only thing myself (and many others) will have use of, but not only for whooping boxes, yet also helping others understand how exploits work and how to write them. I'm sure not few coders could use such examples, and ask questions directly.
But eventually, since you are complaining that most of the masses will use it for defacing boxes, I can just say that most of whats talked about in governmentsecurity forums is defacement of sites, tools for defacement, autorooters, new exploits and so on. not to mention - giving a public stage for defacing experiences, and compiled working exploit codes. So you're not quite "off the responsibility" on this one. You do help the kids deface, whether you like it or not. I, however, personally don't have any objection to this act, since those companies who make the programs, Micro$oft at particular, will never do enough to improve their products' security otherwise. they just won't learn, and customers who get hit might try alternatives, which will also affect those companies who release buggy products, to improve. and fact is, as much as i believe in the microsoft-u.s. government infamous conspiracy, they have got security standards much higher then how it was few years ago (yet still not good enough).
just my 2cents...
#10 Guest_coder_*
Guest_coder_*
-
- Guests
Posted 21 October 2003 - 07:40 PM
those are 2 pretty pennies...
i'm with tte
i'm with tte
#11 Guest_hermel_*
Guest_hermel_*
-
- Guests
Posted 22 October 2003 - 03:00 AM
I vote for the "Security Scanner", but the "Vulnerabilities Source Code Analyser " is intressting too
#12
shaun2k2
-
- Sergeant Major
-
- 348 posts
Staff Sergeant
Posted 22 October 2003 - 06:47 AM
Yeap, sorry, you're right, exploit code does help people to learn. I'm sorry.
www.securityfocus.com
www.packetstormsecurity.org
Enjoy.
But on a serious note, I will edit the poll and add "exploits", and if exploit codes win, we'll write exploits for newly discovered vulnerabilities. If that's what you want, it's what you'll get. Don't come whinging to us when you realise that exploits really aren't so exciting...
Heh, I would quite like to write a firewall. Maybe we could do multiple stuff...
Thank you for your time.
Shaun.
www.securityfocus.com
www.packetstormsecurity.org
Enjoy.
But on a serious note, I will edit the poll and add "exploits", and if exploit codes win, we'll write exploits for newly discovered vulnerabilities. If that's what you want, it's what you'll get. Don't come whinging to us when you realise that exploits really aren't so exciting...
Heh, I would quite like to write a firewall. Maybe we could do multiple stuff...
Thank you for your time.
Shaun.
#13 Guest_raptor_*
Guest_raptor_*
-
- Guests
Posted 23 October 2003 - 07:12 AM
i think that a code analyser would be the best...
that's what we don't have...
i don't understand what it will be able to do but i think it will be great...
also, for guys that post a scanner or are going to post for scanner request, i must tell them to think about this again...
cause scanners are everywhere out...
they can google for them...
that's what we don't have...
i don't understand what it will be able to do but i think it will be great...
also, for guys that post a scanner or are going to post for scanner request, i must tell them to think about this again...
cause scanners are everywhere out...
they can google for them...
#14
virus
-
- Members
-
- 506 posts
Specialist
Posted 23 October 2003 - 10:41 AM
Well I'm in for the Firewall. Maybe u guys can think of something different .... I"ll try to thin kover it and do some research ....
P.S: I'm a white hatter
P.S: I'm a white hatter
#15
shaun2k2
-
- Sergeant Major
-
- 348 posts
Staff Sergeant
Posted 23 October 2003 - 10:53 AM
Looks like source code analyser is winning so far. Keep those votes coming, whoever hasn't voted yet.
By the way, I haven't voted, I submitted a null vote to keep it as fair as possible.
-Shaun.
By the way, I haven't voted, I submitted a null vote to keep it as fair as possible.
-Shaun.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
