Forums: President Signs Antispam Law - Forums

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

President Signs Antispam Law

#1 User is offline   Blake 

  • Former Commander In Chief
  • Icon
  • Group: Retired General
  • Posts: 7,317
  • Joined: 24-September 02

Posted 16 December 2003 - 01:04 PM

Known as the CAN-SPAM Act, the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 takes effect on January 1. The law prohibits the use of false header information in bulk commercial e-mail and requires unsolicited messages to include opt-out instructions. Penalties for violations include fines of up to $250 per e-mail, capped at up to $6 million.

The bill's authors, Senator Conrad Burns (R-Montana) and Senator Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), praised the legislation as a powerful tool for countering the spam onslaught cluttering in-boxes.

"Swift and aggressive enforcement will be essential, and Senator Burns and I will continue to push the Federal Trade Commission and others to use the tools this law gives them to fight against spam," Wyden says in a written statement. more>>
0

#2 User is offline   Blake 

  • Former Commander In Chief
  • Icon
  • Group: Retired General
  • Posts: 7,317
  • Joined: 24-September 02

Posted 16 December 2003 - 01:05 PM

So spam carries a hirer penalty than drugs...... Interesting, sometimes US law scares me.
0

#3 User is offline   phase 

  • Private First Class
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 15-December 03

Posted 16 December 2003 - 01:20 PM

My question is who and how will enforce this? The idea of a spam bill is great! But seems unlikely to work. Its like the do-not-call list, its great except for the fact that I still get calls and if I report them there is no action taken for individual calls. If I report spam what good would it really do?

:ph34r:
0

#4 User is offline   phase 

  • Private First Class
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 15-December 03

Posted 16 December 2003 - 01:24 PM

As I dig after my own post i found this:

http://www.daytondai...spambounty.html


Its a good Idea if you ask me!

:ph34r:
0

#5 User is offline   Blake 

  • Former Commander In Chief
  • Icon
  • Group: Retired General
  • Posts: 7,317
  • Joined: 24-September 02

Posted 16 December 2003 - 07:58 PM

It's a good idea but I am not sure it should carry a felony conviction.
0

#6 Guest_dreedz_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 17 December 2003 - 04:36 AM

about time! now all we need is to enforce this rule everywhere.
0

#7 User is offline   ellitio 

  • Private First Class
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 76
  • Joined: 16-December 03

Posted 17 December 2003 - 06:15 AM

dreedz, on Dec 17 2003, 12:36 PM, said:

about time! now all we need is to enforce this rule everywhere.

hope this law will be soon in holland... :rolleyes:
0

#8 User is offline   Buluemoon 

  • Private First Class
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 116
  • Joined: 18-December 03

Posted 18 December 2003 - 08:09 PM

I agree that this is a good Idea, would be nice not having to delete 40-50 spam messages each day just to find my 1 or 2 real emails. I tend to think that it will be like most US laws and there will be "little guys" getting prison time out of this while the big corporate spammers will never be touched.
0

#9 User is offline   Blake 

  • Former Commander In Chief
  • Icon
  • Group: Retired General
  • Posts: 7,317
  • Joined: 24-September 02

Posted 21 December 2003 - 07:09 PM

Buluemoon, on Dec 18 2003, 11:09 PM, said:

I agree that this is a good Idea, would be nice not having to delete 40-50 spam messages each day just to find my 1 or 2 real emails. I tend to think that it will be like most US laws and there will be "little guys" getting prison time out of this while the big corporate spammers will never be touched.

You have hit the nail on the head!
0

#10 User is offline   Progressor 

  • Private First Class
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 72
  • Joined: 14-December 03

Posted 23 December 2003 - 11:20 PM

Finally, there are some laws against these spammers... it's amazing how much spam you get these days.
0

#11 User is offline   daTh0r 

  • Private First Class
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 43
  • Joined: 23-December 03

Posted 24 December 2003 - 01:24 AM

This law might be quite good but hacking and using p2p etc is against the law too and everyone does again and again.... :huh:
0

#12 User is offline   tomer_shim 

  • Private First Class
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 01-January 04

Posted 02 January 2004 - 12:55 AM

it's really about time!! tnx for the info! :)
0

#13 User is offline   FiNaLBeTa 

  • Master Sergeant
  • Icon
  • Group: Specialist
  • Posts: 461
  • Joined: 26-December 03

Posted 02 January 2004 - 04:44 AM

Weird, but this law might actually help.
I went from 30 spam a day to 1 in two weeks. (not bye using hotmails spamfilters)

Finally a law witch is actually good for everyone on the net.
0

#14 User is offline   boshcash 

  • Master Sergeant
  • Icon
  • Group: Specialist
  • Posts: 461
  • Joined: 09-October 03

Posted 02 January 2004 - 03:12 PM

this law is useful for everyone , it stops shiteaters from (filtered) around , but i dont think p2p should be made illegal , comeon lots of people benefit from this (i am one of these)..
0

#15 User is offline   rush 

  • Private First Class
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 117
  • Joined: 30-December 03

Posted 02 January 2004 - 03:17 PM

Lets hope the Dutch government will do the same.
Even my grand pa and ma got emails about penis enlargement :blink:
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

  • Share



Our Sponsors:


SwiftLayer Affiliate Web Hosting