Forums: Security Of 802.11a Networks - Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Security Of 802.11a Networks

#1 Guest_Mr_X_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 09 July 2005 - 01:03 PM

I often read thing and speak about things related to security of 802.11b and g networks. Lots of tools exist to audit security such as kismet, aircrack, void11, and so on.
But what about 802.11a networks? Does exist tools like those i described before for 802.11a networks (except netstumbler).
If there's nothing for 'a' network, it can be considerated that it's a secure 'network' and should be used instead of well known b and g (with a little bit encryption of course).
0

#2 User is offline   nolimit 

  • Sergeant First Class
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 387
  • Joined: 27-January 04

Posted 12 July 2005 - 09:31 AM

a is simply outdated and less sparsely used. Some of the tools you mentioned support a adapters. Just look :)
0

#3 User is offline   myth 

  • Master Sergeant
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 408
  • Joined: 09-January 04

Posted 12 July 2005 - 11:11 AM

Quote

If there's nothing for 'a' network, it can be considerated that it's a secure 'network' and should be used instead of well known b and g (with a little bit encryption of course).


Its that kind of statement that suggest 'security by obscurity' .... Which nowadays has been proven wrong ten fold... Dont consider this secure, please dont, its a really idiotic statement/assumption to make....

Assumption is the mother of all f**k ups
0

#4 User is offline   tikbalang 

  • Private First Class
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 122
  • Joined: 10-September 03

Posted 12 July 2005 - 03:22 PM

802.11b/g are developed to enhance security and other features of 802.11a. the lack of security in the 802.11a is the main reason why most company are hesitant to implement it.

-tikz
0

#5 Guest_Mr_X_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 12 July 2005 - 05:22 PM

myth, on Jul 12 2005, 08:11 PM, said:

Quote

If there's nothing for 'a' network, it can be considerated that it's a secure 'network' and should be used instead of well known b and g (with a little bit encryption of course).


Its that kind of statement that suggest 'security by obscurity' .... Which nowadays has been proven wrong ten fold... Dont consider this secure, please dont, its a really idiotic statement/assumption to make....

Assumption is the mother of all f**k ups


I mean a 802.11a with equal security as a 802.11b network, you have less risk to be hacked
--------------------------------------

tikbalang, do you have some paper explaining what you said, i'm interested.
0

#6 User is offline   tikbalang 

  • Private First Class
  • Icon
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 122
  • Joined: 10-September 03

Posted 12 July 2005 - 10:35 PM

Mr_X... you might want to read some information here.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

  • Share



Our Sponsors:


SwiftLayer Affiliate Web Hosting