extreme, on Jan 13 2005, 03:17 AM, said:
Was his pseudonim Ethics?
Yes.
Quote
he was a good mentor, and will be missed. The sad part is he had recently goten a nice job and had put his darker hobbies to rest not but two months ago.
That may explain why he compromised quickly and agreed to help the Secret Service.
Ideally though, someone must have multiple names and monikers in order to be a true asset to any federal agency. This must mean he's active in other aspects of security. He's still young too, and really probably never thought he'd go through with the sale of private info. But who knows.
The thing is, these federal agencies do not develop a devastating approach to squashing underground sites. Ideally, one would infiltrate a site/forum, be active for several months, show their prowess, then start up their own site with "better features". Then, maybe have a tiff with the admins or so. But do it loudly and publicly so everyone knows about the other site.
Then, when the feds do bust the original site, the folks will move to the new site, completed with a tracking/monitoring script that goes so far as to actually get the LAN IP of the visiting users. A script like my PHP tracking script I'm working on, which breaks things down even into stuff like state, city, zip, browser, os, using a java trick to get a real ip even behind a proxy, etc.
This other site, which is now the only place left for the underground, will monitor for approximately a week or two more, then collapse. The underground will lose all forum contacts with each other and will have to rely on emailing and etc. It would be a devastating blow, one which would give the feds a plethora of info, and allow them to completely devastate the underground.
The public display of "BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU" that they did is ill-advised. I was pretty disgusted that they would do such a ridiculous thing. It promotes fear of the government, and no one wants to live in a 1982-ish reverse-utopia.
I'm all for helping the federal agencies out and such, but they've got to approach things not with a power-tripping bravado, but with an actual concern. If the suspected black hat is *NOT* committing a crime, communication should be candid and personal. I often have my doubts that the feds have taken a practical approach to apprehending legitimate blackhats.
One thing of concern to me is the fact that they are only able to go after these social blackhats. What about the loner? What about the guy programming/writing the next destructive worm? What happens if there is actually a horrible payload?