hacking security forum

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Multiple Antivirus Scanners DoS attack.

From: bipin gautam <visitbipin@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue Jun 15 2004 - 07:39:37 EDT

--- Shashank Rai <shash@etisalat-nis.ae> wrote:
> On a Fedora Core-2 box.....
>
> Virus scanning report - 15 June 2004 @ 7:50
>
> F-PROT ANTIVIRUS
> Program version: 4.4.2
> Engine version: 3.14.11
>
> VIRUS SIGNATURE FILES
> SIGN.DEF created 12 June 2004
> SIGN2.DEF created 12 June 2004
> MACRO.DEF created 7 June 2004
>
> Search: /home/shash/tmp/SERVER_dwn.zip
> Action: Report only
> Files: "Dumb" scan of all files
> Switches: -ARCHIVE -PACKED -SERVER
>
>
/home/shash/tmp/SERVER_dwn.zip->BlackHole.zip->1/~.cab->0.cab->cab.com
>
> Infection: EICAR_Test_File
>
/home/shash/tmp/SERVER_dwn.zip->BlackHole.zip->1/~.zip->bipin.zip
>
> Infection: EICAR_Test_File
>
/home/shash/tmp/SERVER_dwn.zip->BlackHole.zip->2/~.cab->0.cab->cab.com
>
> Infection: EICAR_Test_File
>
/home/shash/tmp/SERVER_dwn.zip->BlackHole.zip->2/~.zip->bipin.zip
>
> Infection: EICAR_Test_File
>
/home/shash/tmp/SERVER_dwn.zip->BlackHole.zip->3/~.cab->0.cab->cab.com
>
> Infection: EICAR_Test_File
>
/home/shash/tmp/SERVER_dwn.zip->BlackHole.zip->3/~.zip->bipin.zip
>
> Infection: EICAR_Test_File
>
/home/shash/tmp/SERVER_dwn.zip->BlackHole.zip->4/~.cab->0.cab->cab.com
>
> Infection: EICAR_Test_File
>
/home/shash/tmp/SERVER_dwn.zip->BlackHole.zip->4/~.zip->bipin.zip
>
> Infection: EICAR_Test_File
>
/home/shash/tmp/SERVER_dwn.zip->BlackHole.zip->5/~.cab->0.cab->cab.com
>
> Infection: EICAR_Test_File
>
/home/shash/tmp/SERVER_dwn.zip->BlackHole.zip->5/~.zip->bipin.zip
>
> Infection: EICAR_Test_File
>
> Results of virus scanning:
>
> Files: 1
> MBRs: 0
> Boot sectors: 0
> Objects scanned: 657
> Infected: 10
> Suspicious: 0
> Disinfected: 0
> Deleted: 0
> Renamed: 0
>
> Time: 1:13
>
>
> f-prot vulnerable?????
>

Moreover, If you download such archives from an
internet loaction, or 'copy/paste' such files from a
distination. Those Vulnerable "Antivirus Softwares"
with their auto-protect engines active, may also
trigger a DoS.

There have been reports in some discussion fourms,

*Panda Antivirus
*Norton AV Corporate Ed. (version 7.60.926)
*MacAfee uvscan scan for Linux (4.3.20)
*DrWeb (http://www.drweb.ru/)
*AVG v7.0.251
*ClamAV version 0.07, 0.72 <--- please confirm this!
*eTrust InoculateIT version 6.0

   Are vulnerable.

*F-Prot 4.4.2 for Linux did took considerable amount
of time [avg: 90 seconds] while scanning the file,
there have been conflicting report... whether or not,
F-Prot is vulnerable. But a VA software that takes so
long to scan just a 15 kb file...... is a strange
behavior. I'll personally call, it vulnerable... cauz
a DoS could likely be triggered.

You can get updates of this advisory at,
http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/Multiple_AV_DoS.html

Regards,

Bipin Gautam
http://www.geocities.com/visitbipin/

                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Received on Tue Jun 15 08:38:41 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 15 2004 - 09:06:31 EDT