|
From: Andrew A. Vladimirov <mlists@arhont.com>
Date: Thu May 13 2004 - 14:26:23 EDT
The description of the attack appears to be too general and it is too
Well, if it is the case, then there is nothing new about it. Anyone who
Regards,
-- Dr. Andrew A. Vladimirov CISSP #34081, CWNA, CCNP/CCDP, TIA Linux+ CSO Arhont Ltd - Information Security. Web: http://www.arhont.com http://www.wi-foo.com Tel: +44 (0)870 44 31337 Fax: +44 (0)117 969 0141 GPG: Key ID - 0x1D312310 GPG: Server - gpg.arhont.com michaeltone1975 wrote: > http://www.auscert.org.au/render.html?it=4091 > > The vulnerability is related to the medium access control (MAC) > function of the IEEE 802.11 protocol. WLAN devices perform Carrier > Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA), which > minimises the likelihood of two devices transmitting > simultaneously. Fundamental to the functioning of CSMA/CA is the > Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) procedure, used in all > standards-compliant hardware and performed by a Direct Sequence > Spread Spectrum (DSSS) physical (PHY) layer. > > An attack against this vulnerability exploits the CCA function at > the physical layer and causes all WLAN nodes within range, both > clients and access points (AP), to defer transmission of data for > the duration of the attack. When under attack, the device behaves > as if the channel is always busy, preventing the transmission of > any data over the wireless network. > > > http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.11-1999.pdf > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.htmlReceived on Thu May 13 22:43:42 2004 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 13 2004 - 23:06:56 EDT |
Custom Search
|