|
From: <Glenn_Everhart@bankone.com>
Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 13:15:12 EST
The <delay>+++<delay> scheme, using time delays, was more like the old
-----Original Message-----
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 21:30, cstone wrote:
Doh! I thought that there was an easier way to escape the escape
But, still, isn't a string of characters that the modem won't transfer
Anyway, I'm starting to get nostalgic about the old BBS days -- maybe I
-Luke
-- Luke Scharf, Systems Administrator Virginia Tech Aerospace and Ocean Engineering _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html ********************************************************************** This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you ********************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.htmlReceived on Thu Mar 18 17:04:48 2004 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:03:14 EST |
Custom Search
|