hacking security forum

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Re: open telnet port

From: Todd Towles <toddtowles@brookshires.com>
Date: Thu Sep 09 2004 - 12:37:36 EDT

Yep, call-back modem is a very good idea. But we are sliding OT. =)

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Volker
Tanger
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 9:18 AM
To: ktabic
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Re: open telnet port

Greetings!

> > > getting rid of telnetd is almost always a very good idea.
> >
> > Are there even any legitimate uses for running a telnet daemon any
> >
> [...] need a backup system to get into the server in
> the event that something goes wrong?

Install an out-band management access, e.g. via encrypted call-back
modem. This can be easily achieved via standard mgetty and inittab. This
way you have a (serial) console working if the network has gone sour -
something that can quite easily happen if managing remote firewalls...
;-)

Bye

Volker Tanger
ITK Security

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Received on Thu Sep 09 15:45:58 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 09 2004 - 16:02:45 EDT

Custom Search