Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Re: open telnet port

A reasonable use for telnet is when the ssh deamon goes down, or isn't
started on bootup because of some configuration error...

Yes, I know it isn't secure, but sometimes it can be the last resort...

/kbn

Dave Ewart wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Thursday, 09.09.2004 at 08:13 +0200, list@nolog.org wrote:
>
>
>
>>Steve Kudlak wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'll ask my friend what he does as the "just don't do x" or just get
>>>rid of x never seems like a good idea. If you try to connect with
>>>telnet rather than ssh to that box it just doesn't go through.
>>>
>>>
>>getting rid of telnetd is almost always a very good idea.
>>
>>
>
>Quite so, as I suggested.
>
>Are there even any legitimate uses for running a telnet daemon any more?
>(That is a genuine question - as far as I can see, SSH is always a
>perfect replacement).
>
>Dave.
>- --
>Dave Ewart
>Dave.Ewart@cancer.org.uk
>Computing Manager, Epidemiology Unit, Oxford
>Cancer Research UK
>PGP: CC70 1883 BD92 E665 B840 118B 6E94 2CFD 694D E370
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iD8DBQFBQBL8bpQs/WlN43ARAr0TAJ9N340MHUdsbQV3iiW2rD4sXWNjEwCg4/wm
>yh0Fe7/G58Dgu+pKoSJAtGM=
>=hCDd
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>

-- 
"UNIX is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are."
  --Unknown
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html