RE: !SPAM! [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Richard Verwayen wrote:

> On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 15:12, Todd Towles wrote:
> > The kernel could be save. But with weak passwords, you are toast. Any
> > automated tool would test guest/guest.
> >
> Hello Todd!
>
> You are right about the passwords, but guest is only a unprivileged
> account as you may have on many prodruction machines. But they managed
> to become root on this machine due to a kernel(?) exploit!
> Should I then consider any woody system to be insecure to let people
> work at?

If your uasers are not trustable, then they should not have access to
local systems of yours. Once a person has a shell, then they are 95% to
root.

Thanks,

Ron DuFresne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
        ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***

OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Received on Thu Aug 26 12:36:58 2004