|
Full Version: Remote Lsass Cyrex's Autohax0r...
Well, i love this autohax0r but, how can i use it on a remote box without passing by radmin viewer or vnc (too lame) ?? Coz when i start check scan.txt -t in a netcat shell, i don t have a answer in the shell, but the exe file is loaded in process, but it doesn t create any checked.txt Does anyone can help me to exploit and autohax by this autohaxor on a remote box and via shell ? Thx a lot for all answer and advertises
lsass is dead sasser and all the other lsass worms killed it.
not dead for me, have still mass result in LAN scan
but could U help me plz ?
You know, It kind of hurts me everytime someone says an exploit is dead.
Exploits don't die. Sometimes ISP's will block that port over the internet, but that doesn't mean there arn't machines still vulnerable to it. Besides that, the lsass overflow is a RPC exploit, and I'm surprised netbios and the like was ever allowed over the public internet. Exploits like this are just as valueble now as they were when you saw the first post on Bugtraq.... there are still just as many machines out there to exploit with this. So what if you can't get SYSTEM on personal computers over the internet now? It wasn't a server exploit anyway, it's not meant to be! I still find about 1/2 of the machines scanned during penetration tests on corporate networks to be vulnerable to the old MS03-026 RPC DCOM Buffer Overflow. About 3/4 with lsass. If this kind of a script isn't a good way to demonstrate poor security practices, I don't know what is. Sorry for my rambling it's 1:30 am here and I've been sick all week.... just my $0.02 FYI - I don't endorse script kiddies (whice cyrex is obviosly king of) but if you post the files I may be able to help you with the nc shell issue, since that's more universal than "how can i use this to pwn everyone on my subnet?" And no, by "this kind of a script" I'm not refering to autohackers, just exploits .... (although automated pen-tests like those in CORE IMPACT do indeed make life a little easier...) Sorry for harshness of this post :/
why dont you just write your own script
i made a simple one for the hod sploit and it still gets results on internal scans basically i execute the scan command via ftp site exec and when its done i execute the autohack batch file from radmin`s telnet it works great and all shells are forwarded to my ip however you will get more results running it from the desktop on the remote machine and having the shells connect back there
The program probably wont run under SYSTEM level so you need to execute it as a user with a proper user profile. You can do this with runas.
runas /user:Administrator [program] Or better still, modify the service properties which cmd.exe is running under. Serv-U? Change the logon profile to a vaild user on the box.
Does Y have a bond to test the tools?
yep,
Where is the tool ?? XeLoRy
would be great if someone could serve the check.exe ... didn't found it yet !
thank's.... although lsass is dead, maybe will usefull next day....
it's kinda unusefull tool, most the fast server's are pacthed from this hole, so this tool can be help us.
but tnx any way dude, noce tool.
its not DEAD!!! try to scan a lan on a uni, you'll get plenty of results.
check the topic on the forum, i cant post it a seconde time coz it s still available on the forum, try search engine on...
Does anybody have a link to download?
maybe a littly late but found it on google:
Wierd ... I d/l'd this yesterday to give it a go since lsass is definately not dead ... when I tried the check.exe <filename> -t command I get this error
=============================================== MS04011 Lsasrv.dll RPC OS Checker v1.1 by cyrex =============================================== [-] gethostbyname : Operation not permitted Anyone else run into this one?
Problem solved, I removed the cygwin dlls that are installed with the stripped down metasploit cyg, and removed all extra text from the scan.txt file created by scan500.
A possible WinXP SP2 issue perhaps? Ah, never mnd, i just saw your reply. Enjoy.
Yeah, just to add to that incase anyone else has that problem.
I only get that when there is other words in the scan.txt file. The scan.txt file needs to be just ip's. Hope that clarifies This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
|
||||||||