heh, sounds nice

i got no shell he says it but netcat doesnt make it ??? do you know why?

I get always this Message... do I somethink wrong?

Yeah yu can use every port for bindshell....
Just the scan port is 445!

That's it!


(Sorry for my english -> I am from Germany ^^)

jesus christ, everything is a copy of something else to a degree. just leave it alone, you and your capitalist thinking. nice find tho!!

I can see you have never spent hour and hours on something, that someone took and called their own.

For me, what I see is this. The original author gave us thier time and hard work in making the source code for the exploit. I feel, we owe it to them to give them credit if you use most of thier code.

what about shellcode? look at how many reverse shell and shell binding code are the same. should they and the basic concept behind how they work be kept locked away for nobody to see? lets lock up the linux kernel while were at it also, too many smart people that understand code are finding weak buffers in it...

i can generally see where your coming from, but your just wrong. every exploit that come out are all based on exploting one weakness, each it's own. but for every advisory, look how many exploits are released for each. it's because code can be improvised to crack something each the way the author intends.

</rant>

but yeah, author should of at least acknowledged the other releases.

If you would have read the first post on this thread, you would have seen this:

"found this on security focus, havent seen this particular brew of this ms04011 talken about here yet. the guy that modded it up seemed to do a good job of automating the process more"

The keyword here is Modded, he took no credit for the original work, as for credit, just look at the source and you can see where it came from. The open source world is built on people modding other peoples work, so get used to it! This is how people learn

Very well said.

i guess not.. i've tested it like that and it worked fine...
1st command: xp 10.0.0.0 666
Connecting...Good
Getting a shell...OoOoOps shell!!
2nd command: nc 10.0.0.0 666
C:\windows\system32\

simple as that =)

try some other vulnerable boxes

Yes, the open source world is built on modding other people work so we can all learn from it. But it is not built on the fact people not giving any credit to the orig author. I feel it very simple to give one line, that says code base on so-and-so code. I am, also so shock how many people feel that, there nothing wrong about using someone work, without given then any credit.

GNU license agreement
/* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
*/

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html

take your -vv out of your nc line

lol! i think it was better u play cards or playmobile! sorry but those questions are stupid! sorry iam not 100 % but some questions or answer are funny!

I don't think the problem is your netcat. It should be the way you're perfoming the comands (read all the posts on this topic), or maybe you're trying ranges without vulnerable servers.

it's same if i dont type -vv. -vv just tells me where's the error, if it is. And i scanned IPs before i started exploiting 'em.
Are PCs maybe patched?