Yumm Yumm
But you must logon first, i dunno if Null-Session is enough.
|
Full Version: Ms05-027 Vulnerability In Smb Could Allow Remote C
This update resolves a newly-discovered, privately-reported vulnerability. A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Server Message Block (SMB) that could allow an attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability to take complete control of the affected system. . An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.The vulnerability is documented in the "Vulnerability Details" section of this bulletin.
Yumm Yumm But you must logon first, i dunno if Null-Session is enough. QUOTE(seppel18 @ Jun 15 2005, 08:28 AM) from isc.sans.org MS05-027 Update: There have been a few people who have written in expressing confusion on whether there needs to be authentication for this exploit to work. A plain reading of the bulletin by Microsoft indicates that this is a pre-authentication bug and that any anonymous user can theoretically exploit it.
I's Worm time Again...
Worm time is always interesting. Let's see what this one can do
hehe m$ gangtas did not secure their products again. lets see what happens
i am one with blahplok
its not the worm summertime , the ports are bloced by ISPs by now , so a limited infection will occur .. thats if they released the exploit in public , in the last days i see the exploits are not released or privately released although there exists a critical bug , u have to search urself to get it else u wont find it
QUOTE the ports are bloced by ISPs by now I doubt many ISP's would block Port 445 (SMB) I mean I know mine doesn't, If your talking about AOL and such yeh....
Off the top of my head, I only know of about 5 ISPs which have blocked the netbios ports and it'll be at least a week after the code is released that a worm for it is made, so get a firewall people
QUOTE(saetji @ Jun 16 2005, 08:05 AM) Off the top of my head, I only know of about 5 ISPs which have blocked the netbios ports and it'll be at least a week after the code is released that a worm for it is made, so get a firewall people 5 ISP`s well Aren`t there a little more then a few hundred ISP`s around and just look at all the devastation the lsass sploit did. Started of pretty quitly and ended in a big ass snowball..... Think this might end up with kind of a large effect on the longer run though..... Hopefully people start using there firewall as it was intended to be used for..... Greetz Joepi
Am off to get my firewall then
Those 5 ISPs are the largest in the country and have majority market share (comcast, roadrunner, the rest slip my mind). So for all intents and purposes the port is blocked in the US.
I'm speaking with the US in mind, so I have no idea how ISPs in other countries are structured.
In Germany, the biggest ISP here does not block.
ISP aren't blocking any port in France
After dcom and later lsass most big ISPs, universitys and companys blocked 139 and 445 and kept it that way..
in holland most isp`s don`t block anything i know in belgium they do block ports but not sure wich
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
|
|