hacking contest

hacking exploits security forum
hacking
compliance articles
upgrade backup exec
information security consultant

Pages: 1, 2
brOmstar
i read the source biggrin.gif

btw a the moment i set up a testsystem i will give further information later
kebab1701
hmmm yeah i'd like to hear some more opinions on this exploit b4 i look into it seems a bit strange.
brOmstar
it seems a bit strange..why?

ps: jockel what language is your w2k and what version of bice??

I tried to test it with w2k sp0 german + BlackIce_Defender_v3.6cbd .
The iss-pam1.dll is version 3.6.06. ---> no shell
jockel
QUOTE (vnet576 @ Mar 28 2004, 09:45 PM)
Really? What was the subversion of blackice that u used. Each blackice has a 3 letter extension after the version (example:.v3.6.cbx).

BlackICE PC Protection 3.6 ccb
language german

theres a worm useing same whole :
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcen...witty.worm.html
Hexadecimal
http://illmob.org/0day/iis_pam_autosploit.rar
there is the autohaxor for it. You gotta scan port 4000. The sploit is compiled and everything. Thanx illmob !!
cyrixx
your autohaxxor scans 4 tcp. not for udp
Alexander01
how do i use that nasl script.. it's created to work for with the nesses scanner, but that scanner runs under unix and i can only download the source code of that script.. there is also a win32 version of nessus but how do i import that script.. do i need to compile something or how does it works?
x1`
this scanner can for udp and u can set which ports
http://www.ks-soft.net/ip-tools.eng/index.htm
http://www.glocksoft.com/port_scanner.htm
rockerx
i had no probs to compile it under suse 9.0
but no targets found, yet

greetz
willywutz
I added this Exploit to TheWatcher´s ExploitManager ( damn, i like this Tool ) ;>
So not necessary to scan for a port and after to check the scan´s again for a vuln. Couldn´t get a shell yet but tried only some few machines. Think need more time for me to completly figure it out.
XpProf
Thanks for the tip laugh.gif
I'm gonna to test the sploit on my system wink.gif

Xp
nolimit
Just picked this exploit up and started playing with it, from what I've gathered thier is no way to scan, not UDP nor TCP. port 4000 is the binded port on the exploiters computer, When ran my firewall indicates the sploit sends the UDP packet at port 49597(not cited anywhere in code, presumably non important).
CODE

S:\HACKING\tools>nc -l -u -p 49597 -vv
listening on [any] 49597 ...
DNS fwd/rev mismatch: localhost != meh
connect to [127.0.0.1] from localhost [127.0.0.1] 4000
♣      ↕☻            ☻, ♣      n                 ☺                  A☻♣      ▐♥
             ☺  ☺  ☺  ▲☻ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ

So What I've gathered is
1. All transmissions are done over UDP protocol.
2. While source port is 4000 on exploiters machine, the target port is unimportant, as Blackice monitors all ports and is exploited through that mechanism.

Therefore, I'm pretty sure thiers only a few ways to scan for this, most unappealing.
This is why the whitty worm as far I could tell just blindly launches packets out at hosts on the network rather then scanning for them.
So most likely if I was going to exploit this on a mass scale level I'd just build a quick packet transmitter and go down a range..

This was all gathered in a span of 10 minutes or so, If anything's incorrect feel free to comment and/or suggest.
krush
what's the deal with the listen port and listen host part, when we have the ip's from the scan, what should we add as the port to listne on?
slaughter
Thanks for sharing. sland nmap can scan UDP port

CU.
prog
Are there any reports of a remote nt udp scanner?

Any help would be appreciated.
fre4k
QUOTE (slaughter @ Mar 30 2004, 06:04 PM)
Thanks for sharing. sland nmap can scan UDP port

CU.

nmap is for UNIX/LINUX, right ?!?
usch
yes it is but Superscan 4.0 (www.foundstone.com) also supports UDP scanning


regards
x1`
so if i scan port 4000 udp there the ips with blackice running and the sploit will work
using superscan v4
nolimit
QUOTE (Dickybob20 @ Mar 30 2004, 07:01 PM)
so if i scan port 4000 udp there the ips with blackice running and the sploit will work
using superscan v4

No, As everyone seems to be ignoring 4000 is the source port of the attack, from the exploiter, NOT the target. scanning UDP port 4000 will not help.
BuzzDee
lol give it up - they wont believe u wink.gif

clubfed already said twice whats the point and everyone keeps talking about scanning udp port 4000...

strange ppl in here ph34r.gif
Parce
if u guys wanna know wut proggy scans udp and is cmd line ill tell ya the name... ScanLine 1.01 ... but its not important coz this xploit has nottin to do with port 4000 ... as sum1 said... just get a range of ips.. and test with all of em.. ne machine may be vuln.. ull never know tongue.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.

 
Invision Power Board © 2001-2005 Invision Power Services, Inc.