dotcom
Mar 13 2004, 09:07 AM
A quote from my email conversations with KAV regarding the recent trojan he attempted to pass off as a noob tool for ipc$ securing
Sure it's spam but also on topic spam ...if your using his method to bypass KAV you can be assured they are on it
/me tries to dodge the warning points for this spam
I imagine he's made a new account by now and likely grumbling about this post now
| QUOTE |
Hello, thank you, this file was detected as Trojan.Win32.VB.gc Detection will be added to the nearest update.
-- Best regards, Shvetsov Dmitry Virus analyst, Kaspersky Lab.
|
mrBob
Mar 13 2004, 12:31 PM
good work

i hope this is a warning to all those virii spreaders in here
"mess with the best, die like the rest"
(i know, i know; it's old

)
clubfed
Mar 13 2004, 02:32 PM
well, this is an interseting situation.... hm. is it really ok to narc out someone like this and help the av?? I mean whose side are we on really? Granted, Kaspersky are the best of the lot, but otherwise AV are a bunch of goons getting rich off the whole scene.
I think when someone targets "us" then it's appropriate to get them in some way, but I'm not sure helping the AV is the best way. It's like when oyu are doing something shady and someone screws you, you don't call the cops on them, you just don't involve The Man, know what I mean? Sets a bad precedent, and bad karma.
I guess it depends on whether you are Full Disclosure, or so-called Anti-Sec. I used to be full disclosure, but then the government *fvcked* me badly and unjustly, and I've turned dark and now favor nondisclosure. Fck 'em.
anyway just something to think about...
Flowby
Mar 13 2004, 08:27 PM
Hmmm you guys didn tknow what KASPERSKY is until 1 month ago....
Before you were all saying Norton is the best he he he h noobs....
clubfed
Mar 15 2004, 03:53 AM
flowby speak for yourself, I've been using kaspersky for several years, about a year and a half ago I was trying RAV instead, because they had better unpackers, and dabbled with nod32 when they came out, but always went back to good old kaspersky.
Norton and McAfee have always, and I mean *always* been the bottom of the barrel. I was writing msdos virii in 1992 or so, that could strip mcafee's "innoculation" off the file and of course beat their string detection (but then, any new code will beat existing strings). Though.. back then I was writing simple com infectors, didn't get to exe infection until years later.
also i always find it funny when people call new users "noobs" which, in case you weren't aware, didn't enter into the common slang until the last year or two at the most. From maybe 1985 to 2000 or so the term was "lamer". Oldschool people look at all this "LOL" "NOOB" "HAX0R" "PWN" and we're like.. what the fvck are you kids talking about, what was wrong with k-rad 31337?
Eyeless
Mar 15 2004, 11:31 PM
Times have changed, Your going to turn into one of those old people who wont except anything new, I mean Tom and Brute (dads name says it was popular) use to be popular names; Now there uncommon and this is excepted by all. You sound like a old person grumbling about the way people choose weak names to quote me gramps "What happend to names like Brutis, now everyone chooses weak names. What happen to the good ole days when men sounded tuff? Now we got those damn Gays running around like they own the place." lol see the simularity? Get with the times grampa.. n00b is now what is socially excepted. Wow K-rad you have been on the scene a long time...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.