tibbar
Mar 2 2004, 11:48 PM
After receiving many PM's to supply source code etc, I've decided to post the code with a batch file to feed off scan500.exe.
usage is simple.
first run scan500.exe to generate a list of ip with open port 139 - i.e.:
scan500 -p 139 startip endip
this will generate scan.txt for you.
edit scan txt to remove 1st line - i.e. you only want ips in this file, no text.
Now simply run scanlist.bat to automatically test each ip in scan.txt.
Enjoy ;-)
(for educational purposes only).
| QUOTE (tibbar @ Mar 2 2004, 11:48 PM) |
| (for educational purposes only) |
okey, i'll use it for all *.edu in my area

thanks!
tibbar
Mar 2 2004, 11:55 PM
heh it's best for .edu...use it remotely to bypass the blocked 139...
nowhere
Mar 3 2004, 12:46 AM
thx for sharing i will ve a look
great...might become handy...
THX for sharing!!
tibbar
Mar 3 2004, 01:37 AM
i am going to recode this as a single .c prog, as it runs a lot slower like this through batch file.
i will post it here in a few days...
stonebreaker
Mar 3 2004, 02:20 AM
i think there are too many virus for this hole
and now many machines install a firewall
further more the isp has block the port 139 445
tibbar
Mar 3 2004, 02:29 AM
very true stonebreaker, but that is not it's only use.
Suppose you have remote access to a box on a lan or wan. Behind the corporate firewall, all the netbios ports are open...and this exploit will work perfectly on the pre-Nov '03 patched.
is this a auto hacker then it goes through scans and then checks for shell?
or just a checker to find vun servers , if so does it make a output file saying what vunrable etc?
tibbar
Mar 3 2004, 08:41 AM
by typing scan500 -p 139 ipstart ipend it will generate a ip list of possible targets (i.e. ones with one port 139).
you then type scanlist.bat to run this list through the exploit prog.
and it's undetectable by antivirus

tnx
limbox
Mar 3 2004, 10:24 AM
thanks a lot, do you have the source code of the exploit as well ?
Paul
Mar 3 2004, 04:22 PM
Ill try it @ my school, when im on some pc.
Going to be fun i hope, thnx
Bombers
Mar 3 2004, 08:26 PM
thanx for your work
but i try 60000 computers on a lan network
it's sends the exoplit but it's allways says
connect() to the bindshell failed
hmm maybe i need to list NC on port 4445 ??
or its auto ?
THoRaX
Mar 3 2004, 09:39 PM
| QUOTE (Bombers @ Mar 3 2004, 08:26 PM) |
thanx for your work but i try 60000 computers on a lan network it's sends the exoplit but it's allways says connect() to the bindshell failed
hmm maybe i need to list NC on port 4445 ?? or its auto ? |
Same error here. Just before it sais that an error comes, but it is away within a second. maybe a little bug?
boshcash
Mar 3 2004, 09:41 PM
| QUOTE (ST. @ Mar 2 2004, 11:53 PM) |
| QUOTE (tibbar @ Mar 2 2004, 11:48 PM) | | (for educational purposes only) |
okey, i'll use it for all *.edu in my area  thanks! |
lool nice one man
clubfed
Mar 4 2004, 02:43 AM
not that it matters, but FYI the scan500.exe is detected by Kaspersky as 'Exploit.Win32.WebDav.n" .. to the person who said it was undetected.
tibbar
Mar 5 2004, 12:12 AM
KAV detects most things. this is undetected by the mainsteam AV's...no one except hackers use KAV anyway
technoboy
Mar 9 2004, 05:54 AM
| CODE |
[+] 172.16.1.13: Assuming alive, checking 139. [+] 172.16.1.13: 139 open, creating exploit thread. [+] 172.16.1.13: Waiting. [+] 172.16.1.13: Attacking, attempting a null session. [+] 172.16.1.13: Success. [+] 172.16.1.13: GetProcAddr: 71c7c8f8. [+] 172.16.1.13: Sending exploit. [+] 172.16.1.13: Connecting to port 4445. [x] 172.16.1.13: connect() to bindshell failed. |
172.16.1.13 = vmware win2k vanilla
i also receive an error, see attached file.
anyone have a full working sploit handy for this, i want to update my attack tree and dont feel like browsing tons of crap and half working sploit.
liquidSilver
Mar 9 2004, 07:01 AM
I get the same error, on each boxes I try!
Must be a bug, or everyone of them are patched!
bl00dyviper
Mar 9 2004, 01:45 PM
yes i get this error too and every time connect to bindshell failed anything wrong ?
tibbar
Mar 12 2004, 06:14 PM
if you get the error:
[+] 172.16.1.13: Assuming alive, checking 139.
[+] 172.16.1.13: 139 open, creating exploit thread.
[+] 172.16.1.13: Waiting.
[+] 172.16.1.13: Attacking, attempting a null session.
[+] 172.16.1.13: Success.
[+] 172.16.1.13: GetProcAddr: 71c7c8f8.
[+] 172.16.1.13: Sending exploit.
[+] 172.16.1.13: Connecting to port 4445.
[x] 172.16.1.13: connect() to bindshell failed.
that means the box is patched. N.B. you dont need to run netcat, the exploit does it for you.
I have only had success running this on a LAN / WAN...i generally find about 1 in 10 boxes are unpatched.
However, if you try this on a commerical LAN, you should not be surprised if 99% of boxes are patched. Most firms apply updates weekly.
I have never seen the error window pop up that technoboy got, and I cant think of why it happened, maybe his AV didnt like it?
For those asking for working exploit, this is it. I have heard it enjoys great success on .edus...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.