Hex editing has no effect... also morphine, better not use it, some scanners detect morphined viles as viruses, just because they are encrypted wiht morphine. Make your own, or use sources and modify them a lot...
i would like to modify morphine, to make it and its routine undetected by AV scanner.
can you tell me which scanner detected it ?
B3T4
May 23 2004, 07:59 PM
modding morphine is (filtered) though and is certaintly not easy
about armadillo, nice tip, if im not mistaken common programs and games use that protection aswell. Think its deffently something to look into.
strohunter
May 23 2004, 10:35 PM
QUOTE (B3T4 @ May 23 2004, 07:59 PM)
modding morphine is (filtered) though and is certaintly not easy
that's not a problem, i just need the name of AV scannerq that detected morphine routinr to work ^^
QUOTE
about armadillo, nice tip, if im not mistaken common programs and games use that protection aswell. Think its deffently something to look into.
i don't use a software if i don't have access to the source ^^
B3T4
May 24 2004, 09:12 AM
QUOTE
QUOTE
modding morphine is (filtered) though and is certaintly not easy
that's not a problem, i just need the name of AV scannerq that detected morphine routinr to work ^^
Hmm..i hope u dont mess up the unpacking-routine..you'll probly need to mod the packer and the unpacker part.
QUOTE
QUOTE
about armadillo, nice tip, if im not mistaken common programs and games use that protection aswell. Think its deffently something to look into.
i don't use a software if i don't have access to the source ^^
u dont play games ?
Killaloop
May 24 2004, 10:30 AM
yes armadillo is really nice and has hidden alot stuff from AV. only problem with it is that only about 50% of the crypted executable work the stable way they did before. morphine was far better.
strohunter
May 24 2004, 01:53 PM
QUOTE (B3T4 @ May 24 2004, 09:12 AM)
QUOTE
QUOTE
modding morphine is (filtered) though and is certaintly not easy
that's not a problem, i just need the name of AV scannerq that detected morphine routinr to work ^^
Hmm..i hope u dont mess up the unpacking-routine..you'll probly need to mod the packer and the unpacker part.
QUOTE
QUOTE
about armadillo, nice tip, if im not mistaken common programs and games use that protection aswell. Think its deffently something to look into.
i don't use a software if i don't have access to the source ^^
u dont play games ?
don't worried ^^
and no, i don't play games ( well ksoboban from times to times ^^, but ive the sources ;p )
Killaloop
May 24 2004, 02:16 PM
you cannot mod morphine since AV delete every file where the crypting algorithm is found. you would need to recode it all over and only take morphine as a "that's the way it works" example.
Killaloop
May 24 2004, 02:18 PM
/edit double post
you asked what AV delete morphine packed files? KAV, McAfee, Norton not sure about the others
strohunter
May 24 2004, 02:39 PM
KAV doesn't detected morphined exe as virus, but it can unpack it, and of course, see if its really a virus.
i taking about Av software that detected the decryption routine of morphine (wich need to be modified) as virus (even if the packed file is not dangerous) i'll try mcafee
Killaloop
May 24 2004, 03:52 PM
QUOTE (strohunter @ May 24 2004, 02:39 PM)
KAV doesn't detected morphined exe as virus, but it can unpack it, and of course, see if its really a virus.
i taking about Av software that detected the decryption routine of morphine (wich need to be modified) as virus (even if the packed file is not dangerous) i'll try mcafee
KAV deleted my files and said: Morphine*bla will have to recheck. however I still think you dont really know what you talk about by telling you modify the routine. what do you think 2 bytes there and there do the trick? you need to rewrite it at least this is what HF said and I guess he knows what he is talking about
strohunter
May 24 2004, 04:11 PM
peraps you have packed a real virus or thing like that. i've just tested and KAV says that my file is packed with morphine12, but no virus found.
However, how do you know i don't know what i'm talking about ^^, i always mod my upxed file "with the hand ^^", KAV nor PEID doesn't see that its packed anymore. my problem is that it still easy to see "with the hand" that its upx packed, and so to dump the compressed pe file.
morphine is interesting because it crypt the entire EP and IMPORT section
anyway, let's try ^^, it's my time that i waste
101
May 24 2004, 04:32 PM
A method I tested working for both antivirus norton & virusscan enterprise , is the splitting method , a bit long , but you can find the detected signature.
Method is to sort out of the ~100 files (your .exe splitted), 1 file detected & the previous file non detected. Then repeat the split & file sorting processus to be able to find finally the detected sig at 10B.
The bad is that u have to do it for each AV on each files you want to "patch". not tested on KAV but it should work.
UKsplitter is the tool to split, search the net if u want a better text about this , i know my english sux.
bye
//EDIT: If you search about this method , eXeco said "do not do that on a packed exe!" , thats wrong , I tested with a servu packed with aspack 681Ko, found the detected signature by VirusScan Enterprise (it was a 00 to mod in FF), now no more detected.
netxman
Oct 10 2004, 08:54 AM
QUOTE(101 @ May 25 2004, 12:32 AM)
A method I tested working for both antivirus norton & virusscan enterprise , is the splitting method , a bit long , but you can find the detected signature.
Method is to sort out of the ~100 files (your .exe splitted), 1 file detected & the previous file non detected. Then repeat the split & file sorting processus to be able to find finally the detected sig at 10B.
The bad is that u have to do it for each AV on each files you want to "patch". not tested on KAV but it should work.
UKsplitter is the tool to split, search the net if u want a better text about this , i know my english sux.
bye
//EDIT: If you search about this method , eXeco said "do not do that on a packed exe!" , thats wrong , I tested with a servu packed with aspack 681Ko, found the detected signature by VirusScan Enterprise (it was a 00 to mod in FF), now no more detected.
Really true ? I also have done that.
I split a trojan into two parts with Hex editor and checked with McAfee,it showed me that no virus found. So how to find the signature?
SD87
Oct 10 2004, 09:17 PM
upx + yoda crypter 1.2 but now is detected only by kav.
yoda 1.2 is open source asm,c++ change some line to make ur trojan undetectable ;-) .
Eyeless
Oct 21 2004, 09:00 AM
OK OK, this is rediculus..... I have posted more than once tuts. on HEXING your trojans. Its not that hard, it just takes time.. And with some of the new tools out (DONT ASK ME WICH READ MY POSTS AND YOULL FIND THEM!) it isnt very much time. As for someone sending your hexed server to AV, well just change one more letter or number in the signature and walla! Undetectable once again... There are SOOOOO many variations that you could enter that AV couldnt possible include them all. I think the mods should close this thread as it is usless. Maybe make the various posts on making trojans and viri undetectable stickys.... Packing,scrambling,encrypting are all viable meathods as well they just dont work as long... I end in saying, STFU n00b, and also read my sig. Thanks for listening
-Eyeless Master
RandomCode
Nov 4 2004, 09:16 PM
Making files beeing undetected by antivirus is easy, no and u don't need vb.net. If u know reall vb u know how to use the native dlls and ocx from the operating system and the program won't be very big.
Yes, upx + yoda's crypter moded is undetected by kaspersky and f-secure i tested it myself.
Good luck with your program
lacedmemory
Nov 20 2004, 10:43 PM
I think somebody else mentioned it, but using Software-Passport/Armadillo works and always will since it is a commercial program to protect files from being cracked.
Just a few clicks and it's done, way more efficient than hexing.
MpR
Nov 21 2004, 03:05 AM
Molebox Aspack Mew2 and Morphine try various combinations of order of packing aswell remember aspack can be used more then 1 time but can corrupt certain exes while others just get larger ... KAV can be beaten but just like anything you will need to change the packers every week or 2 so get a few ready before you let 1 out into wild then after abit let 2nd 3rd etc
write your own packer and keep it private, it will always works
aelphaeis_mangarae
Nov 22 2004, 06:19 AM
QUOTE
Method is to sort out of the ~100 files (your .exe splitted), 1 file detected & the previous file non detected. Then repeat the split & file sorting processus to be able to find finally the detected sig at 10B.
Does that method still work?
I wrote a tutorial on that ages ago, i think i still have it on my computer...does anyone want me to post it? I stopped distributing it after i thought that method no longer worked.
QUOTE
http://virusscan.jotti.dhs.org/
decent spot to test the outcome exes
Not if you have to upload the exes, always remember some AV sites set up shit like that so they can get undetected binders and stuff.
theclarkkent
Dec 4 2004, 10:42 AM
QUOTE(lacedmemory @ Nov 20 2004, 10:43 PM)
I think somebody else mentioned it, but using Software-Passport/Armadillo works and always will since it is a commercial program to protect files from being cracked.
Just a few clicks and it's done, way more efficient than hexing.
You are right on both parts, somebody said it before but I forget who it was. Yorn, I think and using Software-Passport/Armadillo works, even after exe is exed. It works on everything I have tried, for now anyway.
kent
x1`
Dec 11 2004, 08:03 PM
Armadillo does not keep undected from kav , stop saying it does
FuzZyBeeR
Dec 14 2004, 08:14 AM
QUOTE(aelphaeis_mangarae @ Nov 22 2004, 06:19 AM)
QUOTE
Method is to sort out of the ~100 files (your .exe splitted), 1 file detected & the previous file non detected. Then repeat the split & file sorting processus to be able to find finally the detected sig at 10B.
Does that method still work?
I wrote a tutorial on that ages ago, i think i still have it on my computer...does anyone want me to post it? I stopped distributing it after i thought that method no longer worked.
Yes please Post it here Never hurts to learn some more even if it's a little outdated
SkullSplitter
Mar 31 2005, 10:28 PM
QUOTE(101 @ May 24 2004, 04:32 PM)
Method is to sort out of the ~100 files (your .exe splitted), 1 file detected & the previous file non detected. Then repeat the split & file sorting processus to be able to find finally the detected sig at 10B.
The bad is that u have to do it for each AV on each files you want to "patch". not tested on KAV but it should work.
UKsplitter is the tool to split, search the net if u want a better text about this , i know my english sux.
bye
//EDIT: If you search about this method , eXeco said "do not do that on a packed exe!" , thats wrong , I tested with a servu packed with aspack 681Ko, found the detected signature by VirusScan Enterprise (it was a 00 to mod in FF), now no more detected.
This is really pointlesss. Either code your own or use program encyrption programs such as armadillo and pc gaurd. I have tested pc gaurd and it works on all the av'sI have come across. (Haven't tested on KAV ) This little tut was posted on another thread by someone, can't remember who.
CODE
PC Guard For Win32 Mini Tut - Makes Unpacked/Packed EXE Undetectable
upload to virustotal.com to check if undetectable...
This is not my tutorial nor do i claim to have taken any part in writing it.
-toe
SkullSplitter
Apr 2 2005, 08:04 PM
QUOTE(toe @ Apr 2 2005, 06:24 AM)
This is really pointlesss. Either code your own or use program encyrption programs such as armadillo and pc gaurd. I have tested pc gaurd and it works on all the av'sI have come across. (Haven't tested on KAV ) This little tut was posted on another thread by someone, can't remember who.
CODE
PC Guard For Win32 Mini Tut - Makes Unpacked/Packed EXE Undetectable
upload to virustotal.com to check if undetectable...
This is not my tutorial nor do i claim to have taken any part in writing it.
-toe
i´ve tried it, to make my rbot undetected , but the exe crashes :/
Lie8
Apr 3 2005, 12:07 AM
hmm ... posted by crafty and atleast it had beaten Nod32
AdmiralB
Apr 3 2005, 02:25 AM
looks like theres still no way
toe
Apr 9 2005, 05:06 AM
using pc guard works for me, try a different trojan. i tried it with minimo and it worked fine.
-toe
Lie8
Apr 15 2005, 11:28 PM
yep .... thats one thing with pcguard .... it crashes the exe sometimes .... so, we i have to test the file after each packing
passtheblunt
Apr 17 2005, 08:17 AM
QUOTE(SkullSplitter @ Apr 2 2005, 08:04 PM)
QUOTE(toe @ Apr 2 2005, 06:24 AM)
This is really pointlesss. Either code your own or use program encyrption programs such as armadillo and pc gaurd. I have tested pc gaurd and it works on all the av'sI have come across. (Haven't tested on KAV ) This little tut was posted on another thread by someone, can't remember who.
CODE
PC Guard For Win32 Mini Tut - Makes Unpacked/Packed EXE Undetectable
upload to virustotal.com to check if undetectable...
This is not my tutorial nor do i claim to have taken any part in writing it.
-toe
i´ve tried it, to make my rbot undetected , but the exe crashes :/
Alot of exe files get corrupted (or so it seems ) when packed by certain packers or incrypted with something like morphine . If you know any hex editing then alot of the time theese corrupted files can be fixed simply by replacing what the packer erased from the file, this is normaly found in the end of the file
METAHUMAN
May 22 2005, 10:54 AM
About making the Morphine stub undetected, you have the source code. Add some NOP bytes, randomize the code. Second, learn to code. Nothing will be difficult. There is no such thing as a 'FREE' Meal! !
bah
May 22 2005, 07:01 PM
I like to thank the author of that guide. Being trying for ages to make an exe pass kaspersky with all different tools from upx morphine molebox ASPACK and none of them worked nor their combinations.
However as the guy say taking winhex and your exe u can identify the virus signature that the antivirus prog detects. I intially tried to break my exe in two as the guide said. However neither part was detected, so I new this was wrong unless of course I cut in the place of the antivirus signature which would have been one hell of a lucky stroke!
So instead what I did was I started from the bottom of the file upwards and deleted chunks until the kasp didnt see it any more. Then I went back just as he says and start deleting line by line till I got the line it was on then simply delete 2 char block till i found the block responsible for the signature. You would be surprise it didnt actually take that long.
Next was changing the code some changes broke the prog so I either made subtle changes from 0 to 1 or moved the changes downstream/upstream and this worked.
Note in the case of my rat I found two av signatures. Interestingly I compared 3 different antivirus engines nood kaspersky and mceef and each of them have diff tags for the rat. So be careful when hexing the rat as u may get it past one detector but another may have a diff signature.
crafty
May 27 2005, 02:07 AM
im glad to see my PC Guard tutorial is still being used.
don't forget to try the DOS version of pc guard if your trojan becomes wrecked.
extreme
May 27 2005, 04:37 AM
The reason why most of the packers screws up your EXE is because this option is turned on: "strip_overlays = 1" But that is what makes trojan easily detected anyway..
METAHUMAN
May 29 2005, 07:58 AM
Okay... I coded a stupid crypter(long time back), but it did the job! The idea was to encrypt the file in Base64. In the stub, add a decrypter. No MZ signatures, no bull shit. If you must, you can use other encryption methods, create a new one of your own just to be on the safe side. I did it in Base64 due to my limited programming capabilites at that time. The stub was in VC++, which added about 2.5 kbs to the file size.
dont-staY
May 29 2005, 08:56 AM
i wrote a crypter for AsPack'ed files and called it AsCrypt. It is written in C++. Some parts of the code i've assumed from UpolyX. It crypts the Stub and modifies the section names so AVs doesn't recognise files crypted with AsCrypt as AsPack'ed files. Maybe I will release it to public.
tric
May 29 2005, 10:59 PM
Very interesting....I guess the point of your post was just to tease us eh.
If on the other hand you are releasing to select few, I would be interested in a copy...
JaG
May 29 2005, 11:26 PM
QUOTE(dont-staY @ May 29 2005, 08:56 AM)
i wrote a crypter for AsPack'ed files and called it AsCrypt. It is written in C++. Some parts of the code i've assumed from UpolyX. It crypts the Stub and modifies the section names so AVs doesn't recognise files crypted with AsCrypt as AsPack'ed files. Maybe I will release it to public.
im sooooo jealous
Freakazoid
May 30 2005, 07:52 AM
is it possible to get the crypter??? Would be cool
LittleHacker
May 30 2005, 08:03 AM
I've heard about packers that would extract the packed file directly in ram and so the source file is undetected to AVs.
METAHUMAN
May 30 2005, 10:51 AM
A better option is to download a new 'server' file everytime the server is reboot. Some tool by Aphex does it.. you can also code a similar one so that it stays undetected! After it being executed -> HTTP/FTP, it should just execute the file. On reboot, if the same file name exists, delete it & download a new copy. Best part about this technique is that if your 'server' is detected & removed, tomorrow it will not be, because you might've placed a updated 'server'!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.