pretty sure this is the code, if someone could, compile and exe for me, i'm too lazy.
z0mbi3
Oct 19 2003, 08:10 AM
using visual c++
FxF
Oct 19 2003, 08:31 AM
how is the command for msg.exe? and is it for the new messenger hole an exploit?
thx
FxF
xaph
Oct 19 2003, 08:34 AM
QUOTE (yamaraj @ Oct 19 2003, 08:10 AM)
using visual c++
hmmm why is your exe 1xx kb big? infected with trojan?! Myone is just 30 kb....
Steve2017
Oct 19 2003, 08:40 AM
Thanx 4 sharing, but how 2 use it?
ducky
Oct 19 2003, 08:51 AM
Thanks for the exploits...just one qiestion...it's the mesenger vuln. exploit??
elBartalo
Oct 19 2003, 08:56 AM
I dont understand the exploit... what the command for this exploit? How to scan this bug? Portscan 135 and 139? because its Microsoft Messanger Service...
I dont understand the exploit... what the command for this exploit? How to scan this bug? Portscan 135 and 139? because its Microsoft Messanger Service...
you find a scanner in the file downloads section.
there is no command for this code, cause the ip is build in the exe.
unless the guy changed the code to work ( like me )
Flinston
Oct 19 2003, 10:42 AM
It's just a DOS, not the code execution, isn't it ? o.O
jsands
Oct 19 2003, 10:52 AM
The Code is the overflow which gives you LocalSystem, but yes also a dos, should reboot the computer, or that's what I read.
Flinston
Oct 19 2003, 11:00 AM
in the ms bulletin was a possible code execution mentioned ... is this possible with this code !?
ScriptGod
Oct 19 2003, 11:08 AM
it uses the MS03-043 bug! but doens't execute a code. it only kills the process with this bug. and the system restarts like the DoS attack with the rpc bug
but you need to compile it by your own because there is an attack address in the code you cannot change this address with a parameter
thatsmej
Oct 19 2003, 11:42 AM
QUOTE (ScriptGod @ Oct 19 2003, 11:08 AM)
it uses the MS03-043 bug! but doens't execute a code. it only kills the process with this bug. and the system restarts like the DoS attack with the rpc bug
but you need to compile it by your own because there is an attack address in the code you cannot change this address with a parameter
oke, you forced me ..
it`s 160 kb, cause i only build the debug and not the release ( to lazy )
command: MS03_043_poc ip
jezus, no exe/ no rar / zip is allowed?
element
Oct 19 2003, 11:59 AM
How use?????
Anarchy
Oct 19 2003, 12:37 PM
i scaned lots servers with ms03-043 by Retina MSGSVC.exe i tested the exp.exe ms03_043_cop.exe Remote ip but nothing happend the server is alive,and nothing happened on it
z0mbi3
Oct 19 2003, 02:29 PM
QUOTE (xaph @ Oct 19 2003, 08:34 AM)
QUOTE (yamaraj @ Oct 19 2003, 08:10 AM)
using visual c++
hmmm why is your exe 1xx kb big? infected with trojan?! Myone is just 30 kb....
hey dude dunno about any trojan just copied the code,onto visual c++ then compiled it then uploaded the file from debug folder.
check the file before you use it if you don't believe....
c ya
ScriptGod
Oct 19 2003, 02:55 PM
QUOTE (Anarchy @ Oct 19 2003, 12:37 PM)
i scaned lots servers with ms03-043 by Retina MSGSVC.exe i tested the exp.exe ms03_043_cop.exe Remote ip but nothing happend the server is alive,and nothing happened on it
hmm, i haven't test it against xp. it's possible that works only against win2k
Can anyone incorporate some shellcode into the exploit? Im sure it'll only be a few days until it does come out.
I also tried the DoS attack...it works fine for me although I see no purpose for it apart from shitting on someone you dont like.
Venom
Oct 19 2003, 08:12 PM
jsands please read the rules no compiling requests
jetprice
Oct 19 2003, 09:36 PM
if you want to implement a shellcode yourself you have to know how the code itself works... where is the EIP, how big is the buffer and stuff like that ... it is not done in 2secs ...
If you want to know more about this stuff i suggest first learning c then reading some articles on basic buffer overflows going on to string buffer overflows and so on ... something that you do in 1year ( then you are good )
My point for those who don't know how it works or start learning or wait for the remote code execution source to come out
SLiM577
Oct 19 2003, 11:44 PM
yea i tested this on about 25 or so win2k boxes my self nothing happened box didnt reboot or anything =/
ComSec
Oct 20 2003, 09:14 AM
QUOTE (jsands @ Oct 20 2003, 01:44 AM)
Sorry Venom, didn't really mean to request, i'm just lazy.
read the rules jsands...a good job were not lazy.... warn points added
jsands
Oct 20 2003, 01:44 AM
Sorry Venom, didn't really mean to request, i'm just lazy.
ScriptGod
Oct 20 2003, 07:00 AM
QUOTE (SLiM577 @ Oct 19 2003, 11:44 PM)
yea i tested this on about 25 or so win2k boxes my self nothing happened box didnt reboot or anything =/
are you crazy? to post such a thing in a public forum? I hope you had the allowance to do that...
to the topic... i have compiled my version: usage: MS03_043.exe TargetIP
VincentVega
Oct 20 2003, 07:23 AM
Will this give a remote shell ScriptGod?
I will test it, thanks for sharing
Susboy
Oct 20 2003, 07:32 AM
nope still no luck. Tried all of the exe's. ((201.46.142.186 UNPATCHED (1026))
D:\Tools>MS03_043.exe 201.46.142.186 Max 'body' size (incl. terminal NULL char) = 3940 Total length of strings = 3948 Packet size = 4072 Fields size = 3992
D:\Tools>
did nothing
jsands
Oct 20 2003, 08:04 AM
found a new code for this stupid shit, doubt it will work either though, wouldn't surprise me, shit already makes me feel like some type of lame ass, as it is.
ScriptGod
Oct 20 2003, 08:06 AM
no this will only do a DoS attack on the victim. this is just the exploits with a parameter to set the target... it's not easy to add such a shell.
well it works at my local unpatched win2k system. try to use 2 or 3 times. then the machine should restart after 120 seconds. but i haven't tested it on other systems. it's possible that this one will only work on win2k systems
ScriptGod
Oct 20 2003, 08:09 AM
QUOTE (jsands @ Oct 20 2003, 08:04 AM)
found a new code for this stupid shit, doubt it will work either though, wouldn't surprise me, shit already makes me feel like some type of lame ass, as it is.
this seems to bee the same exploits - only ported to linux and added command line switches
jetprice
Oct 22 2003, 01:14 PM
QUOTE (ComSec @ Oct 20 2003, 09:14 AM)
QUOTE (jsands @ Oct 20 2003, 01:44 AM)
Sorry Venom, didn't really mean to request, i'm just lazy.
read the rules jsands...a good job were not lazy.... warn points added
I agree witht you on this one, personally i think people who are lazy do not belong on this board, they are here for the wrong reasons ( download exploits and hack other networks instead of their own networks )!
Hacking is illegal people ... and for the lazy people i really do hope the cops pass by to get your arse jailed. If you feel offended by this so be it, I think this board is a really good source for sysops, i really feel sorry to read all those kiddie replies, some don't even respect people if they filled their requests, wtf is wrong with you ??? Even worse, some don't even know the basic msdos / linux commands!
So now that i was able to get this out I hope some people will notice this and hopefully think it over before replying with "y0 y0u s1c|< b4st4rd, y0u ju57 41n7 1337 3n0ugh f0r 7h15 pl4c3!" as you can see its not hard to write your stupid slang.
greets to people who use this site for good purposes and not for illegal activities like the fxp scene - ( hello i know you are here )
PS: admins, i don't mind if you delete my reply because of some content that is not allowed... i just think these people (filtered) up your board with dumb and ungrounded replies.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.