You guys dont even bother to trie out the exploits on controlled environments (virtua pc, vmware, etc) and then make these kind of remarks.
Whenever you can, try out an exploit before using it "out there", its the best way to know if it really works, and also to see what traces does it leave like open cmd boxes, net sends, logs, crashes, DoS, etc.
As for KaHT it does not NET SEND anything.
Cya Wolfman
ComSec
Nov 11 2003, 04:22 PM
just run a sniffer...soon find out
PrarieDog
Nov 12 2003, 02:19 AM
thanx for ths info guys, much appreciated....
Feuerstein
Nov 12 2003, 12:20 PM
QUOTE (Wolfman @ Nov 11 2003, 04:55 PM)
Whenever you can, try out an exploit before using it "out there", its the best way to know if it really works, and also to see what traces does it leave like open cmd boxes, net sends, logs, crashes, DoS, etc.
i barely agree
thesource
Nov 12 2003, 12:58 PM
i TOTALLY agree with wolfman. you dont wanna be (filtered) do you??
jak3c
Nov 12 2003, 08:31 PM
yes its just an other possibility of kath...just a demonstration or a joke ! good idea to replace this with net user add blah blah blah !
Feuerstein
Nov 15 2003, 12:17 PM
QUOTE (jak3c @ Nov 12 2003, 10:31 PM)
good idea to replace this with net user add blah blah blah !
thats the clue ^^
JDog45
Nov 15 2003, 09:12 PM
..why was this thread brought back up? It's already been takin care of if you searched the board
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.